Boating, walking, birding, hunting, fishing: our watersheds provide
us all that, plus what goes in upstream comes out in your drinking
water. Withlacoochee, Willacoochee, Alapaha, and Little Rivers: WWALS
Seminar tomorrow in Tifton. Good talks, good food, good water. Y’all come!
-jsq
10:00 – 10:20
Dave Hetzel,
WWALS President
Welcome/Introductions
10:20 – 10:35
Karen Hendrix, WATER MATTERS: Co-Chair
WATER MATTERS:
Focus & Function
10:35 – 11:10
Neill Herring,
Veteran Conservation Lobbyist
at the GA General Assembly
The Political Economy of Water
Conservation in Georgia
11:10 – 11:45
Jesslyn Shields, Georgia River Network
River Protection Success Stories in Georgia
11:45 – 11:55
Break
11:55 – 12:10
Bret Wagenhorst
Water Trails: Conservation and
Development
12:10 – 12:45
Babe McGowan,
Forester
Best Management Practices for
Riparian Ecosystems
12:45 – 1:00
Karan Rawlins,
University of Georgia
SEEDN smartphone app
1:00 – 2:00
Dave Hetzel
Open Discussion
and Pot Luck Lunch
2:00 – 4:00pm
Walk to the Arboretum and
Practice SEEDN App
WWALS Watershed Seminar
10:00 am Saturday
22 September, 2012
Seminar Room
NESPAL Building
2360 Rainwater Road
Tifton Campus
University of Georgia
WWALS
WWALS Watershed
Coalition is an Advocacy
Organization working for
watershed conservation
of the Willacoochee,
Withlacoochee, Alapaha,
and Little River Systems
watershed in south
Georgia and north Florida
through awareness,
environmental
monitoring, and citizen
advocacy.
Introducing WWALS Board
Dave Hetzel — President
John S. Quarterman — VP
Brittney Hull — Treasurer
Nathan Wilkins — Secretary
Gretchen Quarterman
Bret Wagenhorst
Garry Gentry
Karan A. Rawlins
Al Browning
Pot Luck Lunch
All Attendees, please bring
your favorite dish to share
WWALS is Providing
the Main Course
In the spirit of conservation
please bring your own set up:
Plate, fork, knife, spoon, cup
Al Browning of
WWALS
made a point yesterday that I haven’t heard mentioned
by local Chambers of Commerce or economic development agencies:
Suppose there’s a business looking to south Georgia, to move into an area.
They can go to the
Adopt-A-Stream website for that particular area,
and get an idea of where the best water is.
And they may choose… that Berrien County has terrible water;
I’m going to go to Cook County, or Lowndes!
That’s
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream,
which currently doesn’t show any water quality testing sites
for any of those counties, but that could change soon.
Maybe economic development organizations should help it change,
because that lack could be steering businesses elsewhere.
A prominent local economic development appointee asked me last year,
Why would you want absolutely clean ear or water?
Well, businesses considering moving here might want those things
because their employees do.
And their employees might want those things because they
don’t want to get sick.
And besides, who doesn’t like clean air and water?
How did conservation zoning get put on part of Robert Dinkins’ property at Lake Alapaha? County records conflict on that point. Was it important to keep that conservation zoning? Staff thought so, but the Planning Commission thought otherwise, and the Lowndes County Commission decided to agree.
The second county case in the 27 February 2012 Greater Lowndes Planning Commission (GLPC) meeting was
REZ-2012-02 Dinkins, Southern Shore, 0264 007 A&B, ~97 ac., R-21 & CON to R-A, well/septic. They spent 8 1/2 minutes on it, mainly listening to the requester, Robert Dinkins, wonder how any part of the subject property was zoned for conservation. Staff recommended the conservation zoning remain. GLPC voted to recommend removing it.
Here’s a video playlist of this rezoning item in all three meetings (GLPC, LCC Work Session, and LCC Regular Session):
Conservation at Lake Alapaha: REZ-2012-02 Dinkins Regular Session, Greater Lowndes Planning Commission (GLPC), Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 27 February 2012. Work Session, Lowndes County Commission (LCC), Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 12 March 2012. Regular Session, Lowndes County Commission (LCC), Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 13 March 2012. Videos by Gretchen Quarterman for Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange (LAKE).
County Planner Jason Davenport described the problem, which came up in a request to rezone a piece of property that was partly zoned RA (Residential Agriculture) and partly Conservation:
We did get help from the clerk’s office to try to clear up when this property was zoned and why it was zoned conservation. I just don’t have anything [unintelligible]. We have minutes that say one thing and a zoning map that says another.
He said they had had limited time to investigate, and had not been able to resolve this issue.
That issue is still on the table. I would just remind you that in the grand scheme it is a minor issue.
Commissioner Richard Raines made the motion:
For my part I’m for rezoning the entire property RA and eliminating the conservation.
And that’s what they did. Which raises issues of what we should do.
Conservation records Regular Session, Lowndes County Commission (LCC), Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 28 February 2012 13 March 2012. Videos by Gretchen Quarterman for Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange (LAKE).
Other notable parts of this meeting were when
staff
said conservation status was a small detail and
and
Commissioners
proceeded to get rid of it in a rezoning.
Videos
Regular Session, Lowndes County Commission, (LCC),
Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 13 March 2012.
Video by Gretchen Quarterman for Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange (LAKE).
The Comprehensive Energy Plan (CEP) addresses Vermont’s energy
future for electricity, thermal energy, transportation, and land use.
This document represents the efforts of numerous state agencies and
departments, and input from stakeholders and citizens who shared their
insights and knowledge on energy issues over the past ten months. The plan
can be downloaded from this website or may be viewed at the Department
of Public Service, 112 State Street, Montpelier during regular business
hours.
More about those public comments:
The release of the Final CEP 2011 includes the CEP Public Involvement
Report II (above). This document summarizes the written comments received
during the second public comment period, between the release of the CEP
Public Review Draft (CEP) on September 13, 2011 and the close of the
public comment period on November 4, 2011. Over 1,380 written comments
were received via email, the Comprehensive Energy Plan website, and
hard copy between July 15 and November 4. Approximately 350 stakeholder
groups, including municipal, business, and non-profit entities, submitted
comments. Over 830 form-letter comments were signed and submitted by
members of at least three different organizations. Over 200 comments
were submitted by individual members of the general public.
Real input from the entire state. Imagine that!
Vermont’s population is about 622,000, or the size of a single
Congressional district, so maybe it’s easier for them than for Georgia.
On the other hand, maybe a regional south Georgia energy policy,
or even a county policy, would be possible.
Most countries are not building more nuclear power plants,
and some are shutting down some of the ones they have,
because Fukushima has confirmed what Chernoby and Three Mile Island
already told us: maybe the physics is sound, but the business
model leads to unsafe plants.
But in the U.S. and Georgia, it’s full speed ahead for new nukes,
regardless of the risks of radiation leaks or cost overruns.
“We don’t see Fukushima as having a significant impact on the
U.S. industry,” says Scott Peterson, vice president of the industry’s
Nuclear Energy Institute. “The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was renewing
10 licenses for U.S. plants, extending them 20 years in operation. We
were continuing to move forward in examining new reactor designs.”
Nevermind that those extensions mostly go well beyond the design
lifespans of the plants extended.
Marc Chupka, who advises electric utilities as an economist with the
Brattle Group in Washington, wonders who’s going to pay for them.
“Right now, just the plain economics of nuclear power are
underwater,” he says. He notes that over the past decade,
construction costs have skyrocketed and natural gas got more
plentiful and cheaper.
“Things change significantly over relatively short periods of time,”
Chupka says, noting that it takes about a dozen years to plan and
build a new nuclear plant. “That makes it an incredibly challenging
environment to plan for the long term. And that adds to the risk and
it makes investors understandably skittish.”
So we could do what Germany is doing:
Germany says the same: The government will throw its weight and
wealth into solar and wind energy to replace nuclear power.
Most of the cost of a corporate or personal renewable energy installation
can be funded through federal and state rebates, but the remainder
is what stops most people. Here is what I know about that.
There are many other sources of information.
Federal 30% and Georgia 35% rebates add up to 65% (see below under
DSIRE).
That’s for solar (PV or hot water), wind, and some other related items.
The other 35% is what stops most businesses and people.
35% of a $25,000 house solar system is still $8,750.
People like that it will pay itself off in 9-15 years,
but most people don’t have $8,750 to invest.
That’s a business opportunity for some enterprising local bank or banks.
As
Dr. Noll has explained,
if you pay for that remainder yourself,
the system will pay itself off in about 9 years.
If you get a bank to finance it, more like 15 years.
And local banks currently require collateral other than the system itself
(they like real estate as collateral).
The simplest business opportunity is for a local bank to accept
the solar equipment itself as collateral.
After all, it’s worth 65/35 or 185% of the total loan amount.
We, the local citizens occupying Valdosta, urge you to assert your power.
Exercise your right to peaceably assemble; to nonviolently occupy
public space;
to create an open process to address the problems we face, and to generate
solutions accessible to everyone.
Dr. Noll made the case for the cost-effectiveness of solar energy
through, among other things, an analogy to finaninc buying a car.
First Dr. Noll thanked people who had supported
WACE’s anti-biomass work,
and hoped people had had time to read his recent LTE in the VDT,
Waste Not, Want Not.
Then he addressed Commissioner Raines’
comments of the previous day.
Dr. Noll pointed out that solar is
fast becoming less expensive
and with financing costs little more than a car or truck.
Solar is cost-effective —Dr. Noll @ LCC 13 September 2011
Regular Session, Lowndes County Commission (LCC),
Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 13 September 2011.
Videos by Gretchen Quarterman for LAKE, the Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange.