T-SPLOST regional executive committee chairman Ashley Paulk gave his opinion on T-SPLOST at a Lowndes County Democratic Party (LCDP) meeting a few months ago: He’s against it because he doesn’t like a law with a stick in it.
At the same LCDP meeting, Corey Hull of VLMPO explained T-SPLOST, which LAKE videoed in six parts,
- T-SPLOST Explained
- T-SPLOST Business plan
- T-SPLOST Project Lists
- T-SPLOST Penalties and LMIG
- T-SPLOST Projects to GDOT
- T-SPLOST referendum in 2012
Before that, Corey Hull explained T-SPLOST to VLCIA, and got a very interesting question about penalties from Norman Bennett.
VLMPO held an extended public participation period for T-SPLOST in May. Maybe some of you who went can report back on that.
-jsq
Short Link:
For whatever it is worth, I do not know of any local elected officials that support the T-SPLOST in its’ current form. Chairman Paulk is right on target with his comments.